"The New York Times is agreeing with Hamas - Jews living on their historic homeland are the main evil in the Middle East, and this terror attack highlights the "disruptive role" of their communities.
The terror attack itself is not disruptive. Hell, that's expected. If only those uppity Jews would give in to Hamas' reasonable demands to leave or get slaughtered, then peace would reign.
Also, the New York Times highlights the victims as 'settlers' in the first sentence - not Israelis, not civilians, not travelers. No, the NYT defines them in terms of their pejorative term for proud Jews who exercise their free will and choose to live in a place that has the most spiritual meaning for them."
Search
Popular Posts
-
On the 1st April 2015, Iraqi born British Pro-Israel activist Orim Shimshon came to visit Israel and we invited him to give a talk to a roo...
-
NOTICE: This article I submitted won in the quarter-finals of the Pro-Israel blog-off competition . When we seek information on new techn...
-
NOTICE: This article I submitted won in the semi-finals of the Pro-Israel blog-off competition . During Yom Hashoah this year I ma...
Blog Archive
- April 2015 (1)
- July 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (9)
- April 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (1)
- June 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (4)
- January 2012 (1)
- October 2011 (1)
- September 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (28)
- June 2011 (26)
- May 2011 (10)
- April 2011 (10)
- March 2011 (6)
- January 2011 (6)
- December 2010 (14)
- November 2010 (325)
- October 2010 (537)
- September 2010 (722)
- August 2010 (826)
- July 2010 (811)
- June 2010 (1083)
- May 2010 (15)
- April 2010 (5)
- March 2010 (4)
- February 2010 (3)