"Quietly within the foreign-policy machinery of the Obama administration—and quite openly in foreign-policy circles outside it—the idea is taking root that a nuclear Iran is probably inevitable and that the United States and its allies must begin to shift their attention from forestalling the outcome to preparing for its aftermath. According to this line of argument, the failure of the administration’s engagement efforts in 2009, followed by the likely failure of any effective sanctions efforts this year, allows for no other option but the long-term containment and deterrence of Iran, along the lines of the West’s policy toward the Soviet Union throughout the Cold War. As for the possibility of a U.S. or an Israeli military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities, this is said to be no option at all: at best, say the advocates of containment, such strikes would merely delay the regime’s nuclear programs while giving it an alibi to consolidate its power at home and cause mayhem abroad."
View Blog Article
Search
Popular Posts
-
On the 1st April 2015, Iraqi born British Pro-Israel activist Orim Shimshon came to visit Israel and we invited him to give a talk to a roo...
-
NOTICE: This article I submitted won in the quarter-finals of the Pro-Israel blog-off competition . When we seek information on new techn...
-
"Between 1920 and 1970, 900,000 Jews were expelled from Arab and other Muslim countries. The 1940s were a turning point in this tragedy...
Blog Archive
- April 2015 (1)
- July 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (9)
- April 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (1)
- June 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (4)
- January 2012 (1)
- October 2011 (1)
- September 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (28)
- June 2011 (26)
- May 2011 (10)
- April 2011 (10)
- March 2011 (6)
- January 2011 (6)
- December 2010 (14)
- November 2010 (325)
- October 2010 (537)
- September 2010 (722)
- August 2010 (826)
- July 2010 (811)
- June 2010 (1083)
- May 2010 (15)
- April 2010 (5)
- March 2010 (4)
- February 2010 (3)
