Showing posts with label Forward. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Forward. Show all posts

(BLOG) Are They Giving An Oscar To An Anti-Semite?

"By Benjamin Ivry: Hollywood’s Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences intends to award an honorary Oscar to iconic French-Swiss filmmaker Jean-Luc Godard on November 13. But will the academy be honoring a notoriously vocal, albeit French-speaking, anti-Semite?

Admired for avant-garde films like 'Breathless' (1960); 'My Life to Live' (1962) and 'Contempt' (1963), Godard is one of the last survivors of French cinema’s New Wave movement, after the death in January of director Éric Rohmer and the premature 1984 demise of Godard’s colleague and ex-friend, François Truffaut. The friendship between Godard and Truffaut dissolved by the end of the 1960s because of the former’s anti-Semitism, according to two new biographies: 'Godard' by film historian Antoine de Baecque, published in Paris in March, and 'Everything Is Cinema: The Working Life of Jean-Luc Godard' (2008) by Richard Brody.



Both biographers recount a series of incidents expressing Godard’s unhealthy obsession with Jews, which noted French historian and journalist Pierre Assouline, on his Le Monde blog, termed 'anti-Semitic.' In 1968, Godard, in the presence of Truffaut, called producer Pierre Braunberger, an early supporter of New Wave filmmakers, 'sale juif' ('filthy Jew'), after which Truffaut immediately broke from Godard.

Godard’s attitude toward Jews has also come under the microscope because of his contempt for the State of Israel, which he has often called 'a cancer on the map of the Middle East' —including in a famous 1991 interview with the newspaper Libération. His 1976 documentary 'Ici et Ailleurs' ('Here and Elsewhere') contrasts the lives of a French and Palestinian family and features alternatingly flickering images of Golda Meir and Adolf Hitler, proposing them as comparable tyrants. As de Baecque underlines, in 'Ici et Ailleurs' Godard also defends the 1972 Munich Olympics massacre, suggesting that 'before every Olympics finale, an image of Palestinian [refugee] camps should be broadcast.'

When I interviewed Godard in 1991 at his home in the Swiss city of Rolle, I asked him to explain the cancer metaphor. Keeping one eye on a muted television showing tennis, Godard languidly described hospital X-rays of malignant tumors in what he clearly saw as an exact analogy to the Middle East. He discussed the subject more recently, in a 2007 documentary, 'Morceaux de Conversations,' ('Fragments of Conversations With Jean-Luc Godard') made by film historian Jean Narboni, an editor of the influential French film magazine Cahiers du Cinema. Godard tells Narboni that Israelis currently occupy a territory that belongs to 'their eternal fiction, from biblical times onward.' When Narboni states that the term 'fiction' is offensive, Godard flippantly replies that Israelis live on 'reality TV,' whereas Palestinians exist 'in a film by Frederick Wiseman,' the starkly tragic, albeit American Jewish, documentarian.

Reality itself becomes a relative term when Godard, as de Baecque observes, justifies every act of Arab resistance, including terrorism, by saying that 'Israel is a paradoxical form of Nazism’s historical resurgence.' In a 1970 short documentary filmed for German TV, Godard brandished a tract with the slogan 'NazIsrael' emblazoned on it and told the cameraman, 'Write us a check from German television, which is financed by Zionists and that idiotic Social Democrat, Willy Brandt, and that will let us buy weapons for the Palestinians to attack Zionists,' as de Baecque further recounted.

Godard’s fictional films also contain disquieting anti-Semitic utterances, sometimes in the guise of pseudo-humor. In 1964’s 'A Married Woman' ('Une Femme Mariée'), a character states: 'Today, in Germany, I said to someone, ‘How about if tomorrow, we kill all the Jews and the hairdressers?’ He replied, ‘Why the hairdressers?’' In 1967’s 'Two or Three Things I Know About Her' ('Deux ou Trois Choses Que je Sais D’elle'), the director brags that ParisMatch magazine 'always affixes a star to my films, as it does to Jews.' The allusion to the Nazi law forcing Jews to wear yellow stars in Occupied France is symptomatic of a sensibility, usually found among Europe’s ultra-right-wing politicians, that produces crushingly unfunny jokes about such historical tragedy. Godard’s 2010 film, 'Film Socialisme' ('Socialism Film'), which premiered in May at the Cannes Film Festival, features a typical pseudo-aphorism of this ilk: 'Strange thing Hollywood — Jews invented it.'

While Hollywood historians know that the early studio heads were for the most part Jewish, to conclude that this explains the industry’s 'strangeness' is racist, to say the least. Godard is entitled to criticize filmmaking, and he has poured scorn on much of Hollywood’s output — especially on Steven Spielberg — but his comments are clearly not confined to that arena. Even Godard’s friends and collaborators, like the French-Jewish filmmaker Jean-Pierre Gorin, can find themselves insulted. In 1973, Gorin contacted Godard to be paid for his collaborative work on 1972’s 'Tout Va Bien' ('Everything’s Fine'), to which Godard responded, 'Ah, it’s always the same: Jews call you when they hear a cash register opening.'



In a 2009 article in Le Monde, 'Godard and the Jewish Question' by Jean-Luc Douin, Godard is quoted as making an off-camera comment during the filming of a 2006 documentary: 'Palestinians’ suicide bombings in order to bring a Palestinian State into existence ultimately resemble what the Jews did by allowing themselves to be led like sheep to be slaughtered in gas chambers, sacrificing themselves to bring into existence the State of Israel.' Godard apparently believes that Jews committed mass suicide during the Holocaust in order for Israel to be created. The same article quotes him along these lines: 'Basically, there were six million kamikazes' and 'Hollywood was invented by Jewish gangsters.' At least Godard cannot accuse the American film industry of being ungrateful gangsters.

When the Forward submitted some of Godard’s anti-Semitic utterances to the academy, the following written response was issued: 'The Academy is aware that Jean-Luc Godard has made statements in the past that some have construed as anti-Semitic. We are also aware of detailed rebuttals to that charge. Anti-Semitism is of course deplorable, but the Academy has not found the accusations against M. Godard persuasive.'

As 'detailed rebuttals,' an Academy spokesperson cited a single 2009 article in the English-language Canadian magazine Cinemascope by Bill Krohn, a Hollywood correspondent for Cahiers du Cinema, to which Godard and many of the early New Wave directors contributed. Krohn accused Brody of ideological simplification, biographical reductivism, guilt by association, misinterpretation, having felt snubbed by Godard and, overall, perpetrating 'a hatchet job disguised as a celebration of Godard’s genius.' Krohn’s critique is diffuse and short on specifics, but in one concrete instance he suggests that Godard’s exclamation of 'filthy Jew,' taken by Braunberger as a deadly insult, was misunderstood. Krohn unpersuasively interprets it as affectionate banter between old friends and, even more absurdly, as an allusion to Jean Renoir’s classic 1937 film 'La Grande Illusion.'

Assouline expressed astonishment that after Brody’s biography appeared, revealing 'with precision Godard’s anti-Semitism,' Godard was rumored to be preparing an adaptation of Daniel Mendelsohn’s 'The Lost: A Search for Six of Six Million,' tracing the fate of six Holocaust victims. Perhaps film producers make the distinction between an artist of undeniable talent and an individual of extremely dubious opinions. Responding to reporters from the London Sunday Times, Jean-Luc Gaillard, a longtime neighbor of Godard, noted, 'He [Godard] is on a different level from the rest of us, somewhere between genius and completely round the bend.'

In proudly Anglo-dominated Los Angeles, it seems that artists whose odious statements are made in languages other than English can get a free pass and, on occasion, even a hat tip. Because Godard’s statements have been in French, there has been barely any American opposition to the Academy’s nomination. When approached to comment for this story, even staunch opponents of anti-Semitism — such as Rabbi Marvin Hier, head of the Simon Wiesenthal Center and multiple Academy Award winner; noted University of California, Los Angeles, film historian Howard Suber, and writer-producer Lionel Chetwynd — said that they had no personal knowledge of Godard’s reputed anti-Semitism.

Elsewhere — and especially in France, where Godard has worked for several decades — others may agree with Braunberger, who wrote to Truffaut in 1968: 'I will never forgive Godard for his anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism brings joy to no one… I realize that from now on, you can only despise Godard on a human level. ‘Filthy Jew’ is the only insult which I cannot take… If you know what these words evoke within me, what they revive of a past which is still agonizing, you would come over to embrace me. (signed) Your Jewish friend who owes so much of his Jewish happiness to you.'" (source)



(BLOG) Argentine Jewry Takes Berlin

"In honor of the Argentine bicentennial, and the country’s position as guest of honor at the upcoming Frankfurt Book Fair, the Jewish Museum Berlin has turned over several of its rooms to 'Jewish Life in Argentina,' a special exhibition that functions as a living archive of the community’s centuries-old history, as well as a quiet acknowledgment of Germany’s involvement in it.

The theme of the exhibition is books, and each of the show’s five sections is oriented around the idea of the book, whether literally — stacks of Jewish Argentine biographies are piled on tables in the 'Bookstore' section — or figuratively, with sculptures that take books as the central feature of their design."





(NEWS) Lawsuit Accuses IRS Of Screening Israel-Related Charities

"A hawkish pro-Israel activist group has filed a lawsuit alleging that the Internal Revenue Service is impeding or denying applications for tax-exempt status from nonprofit organizations that oppose the Obama administration’s Israel policies. But experts in nonprofit tax law say that the allegations seem far-fetched.

In a complaint filed in federal court in Pennsylvania on August 25, the group, called Z Street, alleged that an IRS agent told an attorney for the organization that delays in the processing of its application for tax-exemption were due to the case receiving extra scrutiny over whether it would oppose administration policy on Israel.

As the Forward reported in January, some argue that the 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case of Bob Jones University v. United States could be interpreted to deny nonprofit status to organizations that oppose established American foreign policy. The Bob Jones decision, which found that 'an institution seeking tax-exempt status must… not be contrary to established public policy,' was written to bar tax exempt groups from participating in racial discrimination."





(BLOG) New Goldstone Follow-Up Probe Will Hold Hamas Accountable For First Time

"A year and a half after Israel’s Gaza military operation — the focus of the United Nations’ damning Goldstone Report — a new investigation launched by the Human Rights Council and due in mid-September will finally examine what Hamas has done to account for its own role in the conflict.

The Goldstone Report accused both Israel and Hamas of committing war crimes. In addition to describing 30 instances in which it said Israel breached international law, it also described the thousands of missiles that were lobbed by Hamas directly at civilian populations in southern Israel.

But since the report was issued, in September 2009, the U.N. General Assembly has twice asked for updates on what has been done to answer the allegations made by the commission headed by South African judge Richard Goldstone. In both instances, the G.A. did not make any specific requests of Hamas, which controls Gaza and is not formally recognized by the international body. Instead, there was reference to 'the Palestinian side.'"





(BLOG) When Shuls Were Banned In America

"When New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg stood on Governors Island, in sight of the Statue of Liberty, and forcefully defended the right of Muslims to build a community center and mosque two blocks from Ground Zero, he expressly made a point of distancing himself from an earlier leader of the city: Peter Stuyvesant, who understood the relationship between religion and state altogether differently than Bloomberg does.

As governor of what was then called New Amsterdam, from 1647-1664, Stuyvesant worked to enforce Calvinist orthodoxy. He objected to public worship for Lutherans, fought Catholicism and threatened those who harbored Quakers with fines and imprisonment. One might easily imagine how he would have treated Muslims."